Article Books and Culture Greg Grandin immigration politics indigenous politics News Reviews the American frontier the American West The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America U.S.-Mexican border

The Frontier Closes In | Dissent Magazine

The Frontier Closes In | Dissent Magazine

The Frontier Closes In

Trump’s wall is a “monument to the ultimate closing of the frontier.” He has deserted the political language of boundless optimism for a darker tone.

Christine Mathias ▪ Summer time 2019
The U.S.-Mexico border close to Nogales, Arizona (Robert Bushell/Wikimedia Commons)

The Finish of the Fantasy: From the Frontier to the Border Wall within the Thoughts of America
By Greg Grandin
Metropolitan Books, 2019, 384 pp.

About 25 million individuals visited Chicago in 1893 for the World’s Truthful. Lots of them took in performances staged by Buffalo Invoice Cody, a legendary entertainer and military scout. Cody capitalized on a pervasive sense that a lengthy period of territorial conquest and settlement was coming to an finish, and he charmed audiences with a tribute to the closing of the frontier. A forged of former cavalrymen, cowboys, and Native performers reenacted “Custer’s Final Struggle” on the 1876 Battle of Little Bighorn, the place Lakota Sioux and Cheyenne warriors repelled a U.S. battalion. The Natives’ victory appealed to spectators as a result of it was ephemeral, and appeared to justify what adopted; Cody additionally imagined the American frontiersman as a worldwide chief, galloping forward of a parade of “Tough Riders of the World.” Within the phrases of the historian Richard Slotkin, “historical past, translated into fable, was re-enacted as ritual.”

Historical past additionally turned fantasy on one other stage in Chicago in 1893, although fewer individuals have been there to witness it. A gaggle of historians had assembled in the course of the truthful to share their analysis, and a younger professor named Frederick Jackson Turner delivered a paper entitled “The Significance of the Frontier in American Historical past.” Turner outlined the frontier as each a spot—a steadily advancing line—and a means of enlargement. “Frontier individualism,” he argued, “promoted democracy” and made the USA distinctive. “The existence of an space of free land, its steady recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, clarify American improvement.”

Turner was not a prolific scholar, however his thesis had an outsized affect on how People thought concerning the previous and the longer term. As he celebrated American individualism, he hid the position the state had performed in encouraging westward migration, seizing Native homelands, massacring Native individuals, and redistributing “free land.” By 1893, settlers have been operating out of area in North America, however Turner predicted that “American power will regularly demand a wider subject for its train.” 5 years later, america went to warfare with Spain; colonized Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines; and made Cuba a digital protectorate. Buffalo Invoice Cody continued performing for giant crowds, however with one necessary change: he changed “Custer’s Final Battle” with a brand new scene, “the Battle of San Juan Hill.” Theodore Roosevelt’s volunteer cavalrymen rode tough over Cuba in quest of new retailers for “American power.” The parable endured.

In The Finish of the Fable, the historian Greg Grandin argues that expansionist visions propelled the USA ahead for greater than 200 years, however now “the nation has lived previous the top of its fantasy.” American intellectuals and politicians from Benjamin Franklin to George W. Bush relied on the thought of the frontier to know the nation’s virtues, improve its energy, and “keep away from a real reckoning with its social issues.” As 13 colonies turned a continental republic after which a superpower, the promise of “countless enlargement . . . deflect[ed] home extremism” on the suitable and the left.

Grandin is a gifted storyteller and a prize-winning historian. Right here, he builds on the work of a number of generations of students, particularly Patricia Limerick, Richard White, and Kelly Lytle Hernández, who’ve struggled to overturn in style misconceptions concerning the U.S. West. Unsurprisingly, one among Donald Trump’s favourite presidents, Andrew Jackson, emerges as Grandin’s antihero. A slave driver, commander in brutal campaigns towards the Creeks and Seminoles, and anti-establishment politician, Jackson constructed an enduringly racist conception of American democracy. A restrained federal authorities protected the person liberty of its white residents as they pushed the frontier west.

Because the nineteenth century drew to an in depth, the frontier was not an identifiable place or an ongoing course of, however it discovered new life as a metaphor, driving abroad enlargement. As Woodrow Wilson wrote in 1902, “We made new frontiers for ourselves past the seas.” Worldwide army engagements and business ties laid the inspiration for a brand new liberal consensus, attenuating each white supremacism and campaigns for social democracy. This consensus unraveled in the course of the Vietnam Warfare, however Ronald Reagan and the New Proper managed to resurrect frontier individualism and channel home discontent into Chilly Conflict geopolitics. Time and again, People turned to overseas relations to resolve home social conflicts.

As a nationalist picture and determine of speech, the frontier was irresistible. Invoice Clinton spoke of financial integration as “our new frontier,” George W. Bush of “frontiers of freedom” throughout the globe, and Barack Obama of “new frontiers” in science and know-how. Then Donald Trump launched his presidential marketing campaign by promising to construct a wall, and “the poetry stopped.” Based on Grandin, Trump’s wall is “America’s new fable, a monument to the ultimate closing of the frontier.” Trump has deserted the popular political language of boundless optimism for a darker tone, pressured People to look inward, and opened up extra political area for excessive views.


Probably the most unique facet of Grandin’s argument is the historic relationship he posits between the thought of the frontier and the truth of the U.S.-Mexico border. The border, he explains, emerged as “the negation of the frontier” and “the repository of the racism and the brutality that the frontier was stated, by its theorists, to go away behind.” In fact, racism didn’t disappear from the remainder of the nation, nevertheless it was “actually pushed to the margins,” coalescing across the border after which filtering again into the mainstream because the frontier fantasy crumbled. Grandin exhibits how specific locations and establishments within the U.S. Southwest turned breeding grounds for vigilante violence and white supremacism. Border enforcement additionally made individuals throughout the USA extra racist, as mass media and nativist politics unfold unfavorable stereotypes about “unlawful aliens.”

Interethnic violence was endemic within the U.S.-Mexico borderlands all through the nineteenth century, however U.S. officers didn’t take vital steps to implement the southern boundary till the 1910s. Throughout and after the U.S.-Mexico Struggle of 1846–48, U.S. troops and native militia operated with little oversight; many Mexicans have been raped, scalped, or lynched. Ulysses S. Grant, who fought his strategy to Mexico Metropolis as a junior officer, later admitted it was “one of the crucial unjust” wars in historical past. Mexico was pressured to cede greater than half of its earlier territorial claims to america. In 1854, the USA bought a further part of land in what’s now southern Arizona and New Mexico, establishing the boundary that endures to today. Since then, individuals on each side have been struggling over the right way to perceive and implement nationwide area. Nineteenth-century surveyors periodically traced the boundary from the Pacific Ocean by way of the Sonoran Desert and alongside the altering course of the Rio Grande. Of their wake, they left nothing however scattered piles of rock and the occasional marble monument.

The huge upheaval of the Mexican Revolution of 1910 introduced unprecedented consideration to the border and impressed renewed anti-Mexican sentiment in america. About one million individuals have been killed over ten years of preventing, and lots of refugees fled to america. Throughout a typhus epidemic, Mexicans crossing the boundary have been pressured to take away their garments for disinfection and sprayed with kerosene. In 1918, a border skirmish motivated authorities to construct a fence dividing the dual cities of Nogales. Different cities quickly adopted go well with. In Texas, lots of or maybe hundreds of ethnic Mexicans have been murdered within the 1910s. Because the historian Monica Muñoz Martinez paperwork in The Injustice By no means Leaves You (2018), Texas Rangers and different regulation enforcement officers discouraged Mexican-People from voting, segregated public areas, and harassed, tortured, and killed with impunity.

Within the 1920s and ’30s, intensified border enforcement inspired People to view Mexicans as felony and inferior. Congress established the Border Patrol in 1924, together with a brand new system for regulating migration involving visas, charges, and literacy checks. The regulation banned most migration from Asia and restricted migration from Europe, however its quotas didn’t apply to the Western Hemisphere; nonetheless, Mexican farmworkers turned targets. White supremacists, together with former cops and Texas Rangers, joined the Border Patrol, creating what Grandin phrases “a vanguard of race vigilantism.” A 1929 regulation made it a criminal offense to enter the USA outdoors official ports of entry, giving authorities a brand new purpose to pursue Mexicans. In line with Kelly Lytle Hernández, U.S. attorneys prosecuted greater than 44,000 individuals for illegal entry within the 1930s. They set a precedent for the Trump administration’s efforts to extend such prosecutions and disqualify migrants who may need authentic claims for asylum.

Paradoxically, as border enforcement and racism elevated, Mexico turned an indispensable supply of labor for america. Between 1942 and 1964, about four.6 million contracts have been signed by Mexican migrants getting into the USA legally as short-term staff underneath the Bracero Program. U.S. and Mexican authorities cooperated to manage migration and deport unauthorized staff. U.S. officers additionally put up a 5.Eight-mile-long chain-link fence in Calexico, California, utilizing leftover wire from a Japanese-American internment camp. Bracero staff had few rights, and undocumented migrants even fewer. One sugar planter advised a journalist, “We used to personal our slaves; now we simply lease them.” After this system ended and a 1965 immigration regulation started making use of immigration quotas to the Western Hemisphere, most Mexican migrants have been undocumented and more and more weak to racist violence. Within the late 1970s, for instance, the Ku Klux Klan organized vigilante border patrols in California and Texas.

Because the U.S. authorities spent extra money on the border within the 1980s and ’90s, it made migration extra harmful. In a apply that the political scientist Victoria Hattam phrases “imperial recycling,” army plane touchdown mats from the period of the Vietnam Warfare have been repurposed to construct metal limitations alongside the California border. Authorities stepped up enforcement in cities, forcing many border-crossers to depend on traffickers and cross in less-patrolled areas, the place they risked being robbed or dying of dehydration or publicity. Some unsupervised Border Patrol brokers tortured migrants, or separated youngsters from their mother and father till the mother and father admitted to getting into unlawfully. Moms, one agent noticed, “would all the time break.” In Undocumented Lives (2018), the historian Ana Raquel Minian argues that U.S. insurance policies made it more durable for Mexicans to return and go frequently, and unintentionally satisfied many individuals to stay completely in the USA.

Enforcement continued to gasoline adverse stereotypes about Mexicans. In 1994, California voters handed Proposition 187, a poll initiative banning undocumented residents from utilizing state providers that was later overturned by a federal courtroom. Governor Pete Wilson ran race-baiting TV advertisements that includes blurry footage provided by the Border Patrol of Mexicans charging throughout the boundary. In 2005, a vigilante group referred to as the Minuteman Undertaking pledged to institute “a residents’ neighborhood watch” alongside the border and reportedly attracted tens of hundreds of adherents; many ultimately joined the Tea Get together motion. Because the 2008 recession, extra Mexicans have left the USA than entered. In the meantime, surging drug-related violence in Mexico impressed new racist tropes about criminality, which have been additionally utilized to Central American migrants arriving in higher numbers.

Donald Trump’s marketing campaign made probably the most of those tropes. At a serious rally in Phoenix in 2015, he was launched by the native sheriff, Joe Arpaio, who was infamous for arranging office raids and visitors stops to focus on probably undocumented Arizonans. “We will’t be nice if we don’t have a border,” Trump declared. In 2017, Arpaio was convicted of contempt for ignoring a courtroom order to cease racial profiling, however Trump swiftly pardoned him. When information broke that the Trump administration was separating youngsters of asylum-seekers from their households, Arpaio feigned shock on the public’s concern: “We arrest so many individuals and take them away from the youngsters, so I don’t know why we’re concentrating a lot concerning the border concern.”


It’s tempting to write down off Trump’s wall as a distraction or one other pork-barrel venture we might quickly overlook. As Janet Napolitano, then governor of Arizona, noticed in 2005 throughout debates that led to the development of about 700 miles of border fencing, “You present me a fifty-foot wall, and I’ll present you a fifty-one-foot ladder. . . . That’s the best way the border works.” When Trump partially closed the federal authorities in December 2018, some commentators questioned if Democratic leaders ought to simply let him have his wall, in order that others might return to the enterprise of governing. The issue with that line of reasoning is that, as Grandin astutely observes, “the purpose isn’t to truly construct ‘the wall’ however to always announce the constructing of the wall.” In response to former Trump adviser Sam Nunberg, the picture of a wall was supposed to assist the actual property magnate keep in mind to speak about immigration on the marketing campaign path. It turned an inexhaustible supply of nativist rhetoric.

The $5.7 billion that Trump demanded in the course of the shutdown wouldn’t have been sufficient to assemble any type of barrier from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico. Even after the administration declared a nationwide emergency, diverted protection funds, and commenced awarding development contracts, the aim was nonetheless to not construct a wall. Slightly, the impossibility of the duty is what makes for such compelling politics. The unfinished wall threatens to grow to be as highly effective a logo in the present day because the vanishing frontier was for earlier generations. As Grandin factors out, Trump discovered “a approach to acknowledge capitalism’s limits, its ache, with out having to problem capitalism’s phrases.” The wall, he writes, “presents its personal illusions, a mystification that concurrently acknowledges and refuses limits.” Polls recommend that a majority of People oppose the wall, however Trump’s fable continues to empower and sanction extremism.

Frontier historical past helps clarify how we ended up on this predicament, and in addition presents causes for hope. From its founding by means of Turner’s period and as much as the current day, america has all the time been American, within the broadest sense of the time period. Like the opposite nations within the Western Hemisphere, the USA is a product of 5 centuries of conquest and cultural mixing. To be American is to reckon with this legacy, and People have by no means spoken with a single voice. One of many solely heroes in Grandin’s guide is Martin Luther King Jr., who “used the thought of the frontier to place ahead . . . an alternate imaginative and prescient of American historical past and morality.” In a controversial speech in 1967, King proclaimed, “The conflict in Vietnam is however a symptom of a far deeper illness inside the American spirit.” Militarism was impeding the struggle on poverty at residence by “draw[ing] males and expertise and cash like some demonic, damaging suction tube.”

King was assassinated precisely a yr after that speech, however his voice rang on, albeit not loudly sufficient to drown out different concepts concerning the frontier. The USA turned progressively extra numerous in demographic phrases, and in addition extra polyphonic. For instance, the theorist Gloria Anzaldúa wrote movingly of her id as a bilingual, mixed-race, lesbian feminist in Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987). The ebook had an unlimited affect on Latinx artists, writers, activists, and students. She described la frontera (the Spanish phrase for each frontier and border) as a burden and a blessing, an “open wound” and the supply of her distinctive voice. “To outlive the Borderlands,” she prompt, “you will need to reside sin fronteras / be a crossroads.”

In 1994, when NAFTA went into impact, decreasing obstacles for items and capital however not individuals, the Laguna Pueblo author Leslie Marmon Silko responded with a poignant essay for The Nation about her encounters with the Border Patrol. Whereas brokers harassed U.S. residents and federal contractors put up new limitations alongside the boundary, enterprising locals have been tearing holes in fences and charging individuals to cross. Like Anzaldúa, Silko grew up on the U.S. aspect of the border however felt related to the growing numbers of indigenous individuals touring from Central America and southern Mexico to the USA. “It’s no use,” she concluded; “borders haven’t labored, they usually gained’t work, not now, because the indigenous individuals of the Americas reassert their kinship and solidarity with each other. . . . The Americas are Indian nation, and the ‘Indian drawback’ isn’t about to go away.”

These poetic insights have concrete political implications. Anti-immigrant rhetoric drew voters to the polls in 1994, however immigrant-rights teams in California discovered from their electoral loss. Native activists helped greater than one million individuals develop into residents and register to vote, and lobbied Democratic politicians to rethink their positions on immigration. California turned extra reliably blue. The historian Nicole Hemmer argues that Trump’s victory might encourage an analogous phenomenon on a nationwide scale, if the Democratic Social gathering acknowledges that “demography just isn’t future,” prioritizes native organizing, pays consideration to native considerations, and commits itself to “constructing a broader coalition.” The 2018 midterms provided some proof that such a course may be attainable. For his half, Grandin warns that “coming generations will face a stark selection . . . between barbarism and socialism, or at the least social democracy.”

After the 2016 election, the Mexican artist Enrique Chiu started portray “a mural of brotherhood” alongside the Mexican aspect of present border limitations. Chiu’s murals function vibrant pictures, symbols of peace, and easy messages like “partitions don’t all the time divide; typically they unite buddies.” Volunteers from america and the world over have been serving to Chiu paint, endorsing his dream of a mundo sin fronteras. It seems virtually like the start of a brand new American fable.

Christine Mathias teaches Latin American Historical past at King’s School London.

fbq(‘init’, ‘552845971584446’,
em: ‘insert_email_variable,’
fbq(‘monitor’, ‘PageView’);
(perform(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.src = “//join.fb.internet/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=214067098624442”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(doc, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));